Washington

Medical Marijuana

Medical Marijuana

Wash. Rev. Code. §§ 69.51A.005 to 69.51A.900 (2017)

2015 Act No. 70 PDF
Medical Marijuana
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 25, 2015

2011 Act No. 181 PDF
Medical Marijuana
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 29, 2011

2010 Act No. 284 PDF
Medical Marijuana
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 2010

2007 Act No. 371 PDF
Medical Marijuana
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 2007

1998 Measure 692 PDF
Medical Marijuana
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 3, 1998

Wash. Rev. Code. §§ 69.51.010 to 69.51.080 (2017)

1979 Act No. 136 PDF
Marijuana Therapeutic Research
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 27, 1979

Rules in Progress

There is no limit on the number of plants that can be grown by a licensed producer

Here are the federal penalties for marijuana plants:

Legalization

Marijuana Regulation in Washington State

Wash. Rev. Code. §§ 69.50.325 to 69.50.395 (2017)

2017 Act No. 317 PDF
Marijuana Retail
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 16, 2017

2017 Act No. 316 PDF
Marijuana Retail
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2018

2016 Act No. 170 PDF
Marijuana Retail
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2016

2014 Measure 192 PDF
Marijuana Retail
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 2, 2014

2012 Measure 502 PDF
Marijuana Retail
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 6, 2012

Industrial Hemp

Wash. Rev. Code §§ 15.120.005 to 15.120.060 (2017)

  • Allows hemp production as part of a research program overseen by the Washington State Department of Agriculture.
  • Requires the department establish a seed certification program.

2016 Special Session Act No. 11 PDF
Industrial Hemp
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 2016

Marijuana Classification

Statement with attachmentsOlsen Statement 2015 11 201,492 KB
Statement without attachmentsOlsen 2015 11 20111 KB
Attachment #1mcgill 2011 12 05584 KB
Attachment #2nabp 2010 03 03653 KB
Attachment #3nabp_2010 11 12596 KB
Attachment #4s3123556 KB
Attachment #5nabp_2015 05 132,454 KB
Attachment #6iowa supreme court 2010 05 14842 KB
Attachment #7cv7415 order 20090421829 KB

Repeals by implication are ordinarily not favored in law, and a later act will not operate to repeal an earlier act except in such instances where the later act covers the entire subject matter of the earlier legislation, is complete in itself, and is evidently intended to supersede the prior legislation on the subject, or unless the two acts are so clearly inconsistent with, and repugnant to, each other that they cannot, by a fair and reasonable construction, be reconciled and both given effect. Abel v. Diking, 19 Wn.2d 356, 363, 142 P.2d 1017, 1020 (Wash. 1943).

No one has asked the pharmacy board to revisit the classification, and it has apparently not seen fit to do so. RCW 69.50.204(c)(14). State v. Hanson, 138 Wn. App. 322, 330, 157 P.3d 438, 442 (Wash. App. Div. 3, 2007).

We do not read the Medical Marijuana Act and the Uniform Controlled Substances Act as inconsistent. Indeed, the Medical Marijuana Act never addresses whether marijuana has a currently accepted medical use. It only states that some patients may benefit from medical marijuana. RCW 69.51A.005. State v. Hanson, 138 Wn. App. 322, 331, 157 P.3d 438, 442 (Wash. App. Div. 3, 2007).

History

1971 Act No. 208 PDF
Uniform Controlled Substances Act
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 21, 1971

Resources

Page last updated on January 27, 2018