2015 Act No. 70
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 25, 2015
2011 Act No. 181
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 29, 2011
2010 Act No. 284
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 2010
2007 Act No. 371
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 2007
1998 Measure 692
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 3, 1998
1979 Act No. 136
Marijuana Therapeutic Research
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 27, 1979
There is no limit on the number of plants that can be grown by a licensed producer
Anecdotal and limited scientific evidence indicates that the use of marijuana may be beneficial to alleviate the symptoms of certain physical and mental conditions. However, due to the current federal classification of marijuana as a schedule 1 controlled substance, scientific research has not been performed that would allow for standardized indications of particular strains, which can vary radically in cannabinoid composition; standard, reproducible formula or dosage; or accepted standards for drug purity, potency and quality for the various conditions for which the medical use of marijuana may be authorized. At this time, the decision of what marijuana products may be beneficial is best made by patients in consultation with their health care practitioners. For this reason, the department will not limit the types of products available to qualifying patients. Instead, the department intends to create standards for products that any consumer can rely upon to be reasonably safe and meet quality assurance measures.
Here are the federal penalties for marijuana plants:Federal Penalties
21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(vii)
1000 kilograms (2204.62 pounds / 1.10231 tons) or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of marihuana, or 1,000 or more marihuana plants regardless of weight
$10/50 million — 10 years to life in prison
21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(vii)
100 kilograms (220.462 pounds / 0.110231 tons) or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of marihuana, or 100 or more marihuana plants regardless of weight
$5/25 million — 5 to 40 years in prison
21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C)
50 to 99 kilograms or 50 to 99 plants
$1/5 million — up to 20 years in prison
21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D)
less than 50 kilograms of marihuana, except in the case of 50 or more marihuana plants regardless of weight, 10 kilograms of hashish, or one kilogram of hashish oil,
$250,000/$1 million — up to 5 years in prison
21 U.S.C. § 844
Any person who violates this subsection may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 1 year, and shall be fined a minimum of $1,000, or both,
except that if he commits such offense after a prior conviction under this subchapter or subchapter II of this chapter, or a prior conviction for any drug, narcotic, or chemical offense chargeable under the law of any State, has become final, he shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment for not less than 15 days but not more than 2 years, and shall be fined a minimum of $2,500,L
except, further, that if he commits such offense after two or more prior convictions under this subchapter or subchapter II of this chapter, or two or more prior convictions for any drug, narcotic, or chemical offense chargeable under the law of any State, or a combination of two or more such offenses have become final, he shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment for not less than 90 days but not more than 3 years, and shall be fined a minimum of $5,000.
21 U.S.C. § 844a
(a) In general Any individual who knowingly possesses a controlled substance that is listed in section 841(b)(1)(A) of this title in violation of section 844 of this title in an amount that, as specified by regulation of the Attorney General, is a personal use amount shall be liable to the United States for a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for each such violation.
(b) Income and net assets The income and net assets of an individual shall not be relevant to the determination whether to assess a civil penalty under this section or to prosecute the individual criminally. However, in determining the amount of a penalty under this section, the income and net assets of an individual shall be considered.
(c) Prior conviction A civil penalty may not be assessed under this section if the individual previously was convicted of a Federal or State offense relating to a controlled substance.
(d) Limitation on number of assessments A civil penalty may not be assessed on an individual under this section on more than two separate occasions.
(e) Assessment A civil penalty under this section may be assessed by the Attorney General only by an order made on the record after opportunity for a hearing in accordance with section 554 of title 5. The Attorney General shall provide written notice to the individual who is the subject of the proposed order informing the individual of the opportunity to receive such a hearing with respect to the proposed order. The hearing may be held only if the individual makes a request for the hearing before the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on the date such notice is issued.
2017 Act No. 317
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 16, 2017
2017 Act No. 316
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2018
2016 Act No. 170
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2016
2014 Measure 192
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 2, 2014
2012 Measure 502
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 6, 2012
2016 Special Session Act No. 11
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 2016
Opportunity for Input: Marijuana Scheduling
|Statement with attachments||Olsen Statement 2015 11 20||1,492 KB|
|Statement without attachments||Olsen 2015 11 20||111 KB|
|Attachment #1||mcgill 2011 12 05||584 KB|
|Attachment #2||nabp 2010 03 03||653 KB|
|Attachment #3||nabp_2010 11 12||596 KB|
|Attachment #4||s3123||556 KB|
|Attachment #5||nabp_2015 05 13||2,454 KB|
|Attachment #6||iowa supreme court 2010 05 14||842 KB|
|Attachment #7||cv7415 order 20090421||829 KB|
Repeals by implication are ordinarily not favored in law, and a later act will not operate to repeal an earlier act except in such instances where the later act covers the entire subject matter of the earlier legislation, is complete in itself, and is evidently intended to supersede the prior legislation on the subject, or unless the two acts are so clearly inconsistent with, and repugnant to, each other that they cannot, by a fair and reasonable construction, be reconciled and both given effect. Abel v. Diking, 19 Wn.2d 356, 363, 142 P.2d 1017, 1020 (Wash. 1943).
No one has asked the pharmacy board to revisit the classification, and it has apparently not seen fit to do so. RCW 69.50.204(c)(14). State v. Hanson, 138 Wn. App. 322, 330, 157 P.3d 438, 442 (Wash. App. Div. 3, 2007).
We do not read the Medical Marijuana Act and the Uniform Controlled Substances Act as inconsistent. Indeed, the Medical Marijuana Act never addresses whether marijuana has a currently accepted medical use. It only states that some patients may benefit from medical marijuana. RCW 69.51A.005. State v. Hanson, 138 Wn. App. 322, 331, 157 P.3d 438, 442 (Wash. App. Div. 3, 2007).
1971 Act No. 208
Uniform Controlled Substances Act
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 21, 1971
Page last updated on January 27, 2018